_id	città	regione	edizione Osservatorio Milano	X1 = Index of Local Governance (score 0-1)	x1_anno	x1_città/regione	x1_geo	x1_fonte	x1_note	X1 indice (media=1)	Score di dimensione (media X123 indicizzati)
1	Milano	Lombardia	2017	0,4	2012	Milano	city	Joint Research Center	In order to construct the Index of Local Governance (score 0-1) six indicators were used, based on the percentages of people who in a given city claim that the local government performs very well or fairly well as to 1) providing citizens information about the government expenditures, 2) consulting traditional, civil and community leaders before making decisions, 3) providing information in plain language about people's legal rights, so that everybody can understand them, 4) providing effective ways to make complaints about public services, 5) providing effective ways to handle complaints against local government officials, 6) responding to people's concerns about community matters.	0,92485549132948	0,92485549132948
2	Barcellona	Cataluña	2017	0,43	2012	Barcelona	city	Joint Research Center	In order to construct the Index of Local Governance (score 0-1) six indicators were used, based on the percentages of people who in a given city claim that the local government performs very well or fairly well as to 1) providing citizens information about the government expenditures, 2) consulting traditional, civil and community leaders before making decisions, 3) providing information in plain language about people's legal rights, so that everybody can understand them, 4) providing effective ways to make complaints about public services, 5) providing effective ways to handle complaints against local government officials, 6) responding to people's concerns about community matters.	0,994219653179191	0,994219653179191
3	Lione	Rhône-Alpes	2017	0,42	2012	Lyon	city	Joint Research Center	In order to construct the Index of Local Governance (score 0-1) six indicators were used, based on the percentages of people who in a given city claim that the local government performs very well or fairly well as to 1) providing citizens information about the government expenditures, 2) consulting traditional, civil and community leaders before making decisions, 3) providing information in plain language about people's legal rights, so that everybody can understand them, 4) providing effective ways to make complaints about public services, 5) providing effective ways to handle complaints against local government officials, 6) responding to people's concerns about community matters.	0,971098265895954	0,971098265895954
4	Monaco	Bayern	2017	0,48	2012	Munich	city	Joint Research Center	In order to construct the Index of Local Governance (score 0-1) six indicators were used, based on the percentages of people who in a given city claim that the local government performs very well or fairly well as to 1) providing citizens information about the government expenditures, 2) consulting traditional, civil and community leaders before making decisions, 3) providing information in plain language about people's legal rights, so that everybody can understand them, 4) providing effective ways to make complaints about public services, 5) providing effective ways to handle complaints against local government officials, 6) responding to people's concerns about community matters.	1,10982658959538	1,10982658959538
5	Stoccarda	Baden-Württemberg	2017	n.a	2012	Stuttgart	city	Joint Research Center	In order to construct the Index of Local Governance (score 0-1) six indicators were used, based on the percentages of people who in a given city claim that the local government performs very well or fairly well as to 1) providing citizens information about the government expenditures, 2) consulting traditional, civil and community leaders before making decisions, 3) providing information in plain language about people's legal rights, so that everybody can understand them, 4) providing effective ways to make complaints about public services, 5) providing effective ways to handle complaints against local government officials, 6) responding to people's concerns about community matters.	n.a	n.a